Draft Leadership Critique Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Draft Leadership Critique - Assignment Example integrity of the theories on lead is by James Burns known as transformational theory of leadership. This theory is ground on the belief that leaders and their followers work mutually in order to grow from each one other to higher directs of morality and motivation. It mostly involves engaging the minds and hearts of the employees (Ray, 2013, 59). It is beneficial in ensuring that everyone in the organisation eventually reaches a higher sense of motivation, satisfaction with their work and a greater sense of achievement. In order for this kind of leadership to be successful, there is a need for a certain level of trust and concern rather than having control over the employees. This theory implies that leaders can only take in employees follow in their footsteps of they also follow what they preach.Some of the main criticism of this theory is that it is too muster in and places too much emphasis on heroic aspects of leadership. The expected end result of this is that the followers atomic number 18 bound to be oppressed in a certain way. Transformational leaders rule under the stamp that they have some sort of special abilities that their employees have no access to. Consequently, the destiny of their followers is tightly linked to the ambitions of their leaders. Secondly, in this kind of leadership, there is a likelihood that followers by be manipulated by their leaders and eventually end up losing more than they gain (Lussier & Achua, 2010, 39).Transactional theory of leadership, on the other hand, is found on the idea that the relationship that exists between leaders and their employees develops from the exchange of some form of observe (Bertocci, 2009, 56). The reward could be in terms of salary, praise, recognition or performance ratings. The main limitation of this form of leadership is that it implies that leaders will only reward employees when their